Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:28

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Is Beauty of Joseon Sunscreen good for oily skin?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Red Dead Redemption 2's PS5 Version Could Be Announced Next Week - Push Square
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Mexico prez calls for no ICE action at Gold Cup - ESPN
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Jack Betts, ‘Spider-Man’ Actor and Spaghetti Western Veteran, Dies at 96 - Variety
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Unde non omnis quia ut et magni ea.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.